12 stories
·
0 followers

Riding With a Lady Uber Driver

1 Comment
Phulbas "Patti" Arjune tells us about drunk riders, smooth jazz, and worrying she's having too much fun.
Read the whole story
jnich640
3758 days ago
reply
Go
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete

Russia's Invasion Uncorks Ethnic Strife in Crimea : The New Yorker

1 Share

“I am ashamed,” the Russian said, before letting out the longest and most elaborate profanity I have ever heard. We were standing in the warm Crimean sunshine on Sunday, next to a Ukrainian military base in Perevalnoe, outside Simferopol, the regional capital, surrounded by soldiers, screaming protestors, and television crews. The swearing Russian was a journalist from Moscow, who had just got a tongue-lashing from his editor for calling the Russian soldiers Russian soldiers. “He said we have to refer to them as ‘a friendly volunteer self-defense force,’ ” the journalist bellowed. “Is that what they look like to you?” He crowned the question with another string of swears.

The soldiers—with Kalashnikovs and light antitank missiles, wearing balaclavas and brand-new insignia-free uniforms—certainly did not look like volunteers. Hundreds of them surrounded the perimeter of the Crimean base. Some guarded the concrete fence; others wandered through the bushes of a nearby field, bumping into locals.

“What are you doing here?” an old Ukrainian woman screamed at one of the Russian soldiers. “Your own government is humiliating you. If what you are doing is O.K., then open up your faces, show us who you are.” The soldier turned his back. But, slightly farther up the road, his comrades received a much warmer welcome from a small crowd of supporters. “You are the saviors, you are our boys,” a woman waving a Russian flag shouted, while those around her cheered, “Russia, Russia!”

The road ended at a gate, behind which a dozen Ukrainian soldiers stood, watching the takeover of their base. Standing in front of them was a priest, and nearby a small, nervous man was reading loudly from the Old Testament. As the pro-Russian crowd down the road got noisier, his voice sped up and stiffened; an old nun came up to him and stroked his arm. “Vitya, calm down,” she said. “Use your monotone voice, remember?”

“I pray as I can,” Vitya snapped back. “We all pray as we can. Except some of us pray to the devil at the Red Square.”

Since Sunday, Russia has tightened its grip on the Crimean Peninsula. Ukrainian television has reported that more than fifteen thousand Russian troops are now in Crimea; Ukrainian and Russian ships are in an increasingly tense standoff in the port of Sebastopol. On Monday, the Interfax news agency reported that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet had given the Ukrainian forces in Crimea an ultimatum: surrender by 5 A.M. on Tuesday or face a military assault.

Many Ukrainian troops in Crimea have already been forced to switch sides; some have even taken an oath of loyalty to Russia. Timur, a twenty-nine-year-old officer in the Ukrainian Army, told me that he had refused to sign a piece of paper that Russians presented to the officers in his small unit. “We were ten people on the shift, and ninety Russians showed up and told us to lay down our arms,” he said. “We did.”

Most of Timur’s fellow-officers signed the paper, but he was so upset by the Russian invasion that he wasn’t even sure what it was asking for—allegiance to Russia, or to a Russian-backed regime in Crimea. He walked away from his base, and, he told me, he has since gotten threatening phone calls from people who claim to work for the pro-Moscow administration in Crimea. “They say I still have a chance to go back, and if not my family will be in trouble,” Timur told me. “I don’t want to go—but what do I do? What will they do to me?”

No one here has answers. Simferopol is bursting with tensions and is awash with rumors. As night fell, a few dozen men gathered along a potholed road outside Timur’s house to organize an overnight patrol of the neighborhood. Unarmed, they spoke quietly, divvying up the streets. “Our main goal is not to allow provocation,” one of the leaders told his men.

The neighborhood-watch group was not looking for Russian soldiers but, rather, for other visitors from across the border; the men had received information that Cossacks were entering Crimea. Iskander Babilov, who was a teen-ager when the Soviet Union collapsed, told me that this was no surprise: in all the conflicts in post-Soviet states, Cossacks and other mercenaries from the Caucasus often trailed behind the regular Russian Army, further exacerbating existing social divisions and helping to turn neighbors against one another.

“Their strategy is not to have the Army fight us,” Babilov said. “It is to have us fight each other, so they can say that the Army needs to stay to keep the peace.” Babilov is among the leaders of the Crimean Tatars—a Muslim community, indigenous to the peninsula, which has a long history of bad blood with Russia. For centuries, the Tatars were persecuted by the Tsars, and in 1944 Stalin deported millions of Crimean Tatars to Central Asia.

Babilov said that the arrival of Russian troops has already damaged the region’s fragile ethnic balance. The danger, he says, is that the Russians—who make up sixty per cent of the population—the Ukrainians, and the Tatars will all turn against each other. “We must get along if we are to avoid bloodshed,” Babilov said. But the atmosphere of this nervous peninsula has already been polluted by hateful rhetoric reminiscent of that used in the nineteen-nineties, when the dissolution of the Soviet Union unleashed pent-up ethnic tension across its vast territories.

“I don’t mind Ukrainians in principle, but events in Kiev showed their true Fascist face,” Valentina Nikolaeva, a seventy-two-year-old Russian Crimean, told me. “They want to exterminate us.” Every day, she joins pro-Kremlin demonstrators, who gather under a statue of Lenin in front of a local administration building. “Thank God for Putin,” she said. “He is the only one who will protect us.” Nikolaeva told me that she likes her Tatar neighbors, a comment that infuriated a man standing next to us, who shouted, in response, “Tatars are animals! They are waiting for a chance to kill us.” Nikolaeva argued back, but soon she and the man were surrounded by others, all of them shouting, and she was completely drowned out.

Above: Members of the Russian armed forces stand guard around the Ukrainian military base in the village of Perevalnoe; March 2, 2014. Photograph by Bulent Doruk/Anadolu Agency/Getty.

Read the whole story
jnich640
3914 days ago
reply
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete

What if the Web collapsed?

1 Share

Photo by Vitranc/Thinkstock

As the Internet embeds itself deeper into every aspect of our lives, fears of an Internet apocalypse become more frightening. We worry about how the disintegration of sites like Amazon, Netflix, and Skype would spell the end of our online consumerism, entertainment, and communication.

But while those are all valid concerns, as I wrote my new novel Notes From the Internet Apocalypse, I was more intrigued by how life without the Internet would affect us on a more personal level—specifically, the effects of losing our quick access to information. Perhaps more than anything else, the loss of instant, free-flowing data has the power to change not only how we do things, but who we are. Perhaps for the better.

The first consequence of getting kicked off the information superhighway would be an instant change in how we argue. How many trivial disputes between friends are now instantly resolved by a quick check of Google, IMDb, or Wikipedia? Take a stupid dispute like “Who played the bad kid in Silver Spoons?” That argument wouldn’t last more than a minute now. But before the Internet, you had to state your case based on memory, rhetoric, and emphasis: “I’m positive it was Jason Bateman! He even had his own spinoff called It’s Your Move—y’know, with that guy who was the neighbor on Married With Children. Well, not really a spinoff, but a similar character. Right, this was before Bateman was on Valerie. The show with Valerie Harper. Yes, the chick who played Rhoda on The Mary Tyler Moore Show. You never heard of Valerie? Oh, well yeah, when she left they replaced her with Sandy Duncan and called it The Hogan Family. See? I know what I’m talking about!”

Advertisement

That’s how we did it then, and all those inane arguments had some value. You got to share more of yourself. Conversations went different places, and you created entertainment through the use of language and your inventory of memories. And although not everything about an Internet apocalypse would mean a return to the past, that is one area where the muscle memory would spring back. Untethered from the Internet’s cheat sheet, we’d again argue about what doesn’t matter.

The loss of the Internet would allow us to become someone new.

Like all cheat sheets, the Internet affects how we learn, or maybe more appropriately, don’t learn. Smartphones and the Internet have turned life into an open-book exam. We used to think a sign of intelligence was actually knowing things. If you had a question about black holes or the Alien and Sedition Acts or the use of 19th-century political symbolism in Moby-Dick, you wouldn’t be impressed with some dude who said, “Oh, yeah, I have a book at home that explains all of that.” The acquisition of knowledge meant both acquiring it and putting it in your head. Now, people are impressed with their ability to find information. They’re expert searchers who pick the best sites and pat themselves on the back for their Wiki/Snopes one-two punch of data retrieval. While it’s tempting to say putting information at our fingertips on every subject in the universe has made humankind smarter, we know we’ve only increased our access to information. That access can be a great starting point, but, somehow, we’ve allowed the ability to know to be a substitute for the real acquisition and integration of knowledge. Losing the Internet would increase the value of information, making it a commodity that must be earned, and therefore, safeguarded in memory.

Losing the Internet would also increase the value of the building blocks of that information: words. We used to say that talk was cheap because language is ethereal and fleeting. We felt anything of real value needed to be written down. Not just contracts and mortgages, but personal things like love letters. But somehow, despite being written, texts and instant messages are even less important than spoken words. How much easier is it to text your love or laughter? LOL. <3333. ILU. Texts provide all the immediacy and transience of speech, while removing the intimacy. There is something more precious about paper. Deprived of the Internet, the main character in Notes From the Internet Apocalypse begins occupying his time by scribbling frenetically into a journal. He’s calmed by the activity but unsettled by the permanence of the mark he is leaving. Like most of us, he’s used to writing online, creating expression of little value by commenting and posting on things like family get-togethers and fancy meals. He’s spent years creating the kind of Web-based information that reveals our lives.

And actually, while it may be mundane, the loss of that social media information is also significant. Mostly because that information keeps us on the grid. At the birth of the Internet, we believed it was a place to become someone new. A virtual reality. A place you could assume identities in role-playing video games and anonymous chat rooms. But with so much of our real-life information existing on the Web (not to mention the data-mining efforts of governments and corporations), a very persuasive argument can be made that it’s actually the loss of the Internet that would allow us to become someone new. We would suddenly be free of the inventory of ourselves.

You’d meet some women in a bar and she wouldn’t be able to Google you. No Facebook page would out you on your favorite movie quotations or religious beliefs. (That’s right! She’d have to find out you were a Pastafarian by actually talking to you—if you were actually lame enough to make that joke out loud instead of in an online bio.) You would be in charge of what people knew about you with each new encounter. And for those who’ve dug themselves into an unwanted e-existence of social media and streaming data, an Internet apocalypse might be the perfect chance to clear the cache of daily experience and begin again.

Read the whole story
jnich640
3914 days ago
reply
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete

Breaking, World, US & Local News - nydailynews.com

1 Share

China train station attack an act of terrorism

Linking and embedding are disabled for this video.

Read the whole story
jnich640
3916 days ago
reply
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete

The Week in iPhone Cases: Goldfinger

1 Share
Goldfinger
00 intro

We can't say for sure, but there may be solid gold at the end of the rainbow in this week's iPhone-case roundup, provided that you have the deep pockets to afford it. For the rest of us, we have a nice selection of protection that, while made from more-mundane materials, are anything but commonplace in their own ways.

Bodacious Case
bodaciouscase cambo iphone

The CamBo (iPhone 4, 4s, 5, and 5s; $50) is a water-resistant case that features a camouflage design with a not-so-camouflage bright-color bumper. The case also sports a slot that can hold two ID or credit cards.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Read the whole story
jnich640
3917 days ago
reply
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete

Screen Sharing: Drag and Drop copy

1 Share
Maybe less of a hint, and more of a "I didn't know you could do that!"

If you have connected to a remote Mac using Screen Sharing and don't have a mounted disk, then you can still copy between the two Macs via drag and drop.

Basically, you take a file from the local Finder and drag it to a window of the remote Finder. This will automatically initiate a copy. The reverse is also true. A little experimenting shows numerous applications can act as source, but in all cases a Finder window needs to be the final destination.

[crarko adds: I've done this for ages using things other than Apple's built-in Screen Sharing program, so I don't know when this became available. Did it come along with AirDrop? The full Remote Desktop program has done this since the beginning.]
Read the whole story
jnich640
3917 days ago
reply
New Orleans, Louisiana
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories